Trends in pregnancy, childbirth and miscarriage reflect the basic changes in pregnancy experiences in the population of the United States. Using data that picks up all the results of pregnancy – the rules of miscarriage and the loss of the fetus – the Guttmacher Institute calculates pregnancy statistics for a certain year.
In addition, Guttmacher is conducting research to study trends in these statistics at the level of the population based on how to call individuals who have suffered from pregnancy their previous positions towards pregnancy or having a child before pregnancy occurs. These situations are referred to as “pregnancy desires” and are reported in investigative studies that ask people about previous pregnancies.
American pregnancy statistics and trends
About 5,359,550 of pregnancy occurred in the United States in 2020, the last year in which data is available.
From this pregnancy, 67 % of the live birth, 17 % in miscarriage and 15 % in the loss of the fetus. In 2020, there were 83 pregnancy cases per 1,000 women (see the box) between the ages of 15 and 44. This represents the lowest recorded pregnancy rate for the United States. The rate of pregnancy in 2020 reflects a decrease in the rates of small age groups and the increase in the rates of older women. Pregnancy rates have decreased between the ages of 24 years or less since the late 1980s. In 2020, there were 11 of pregnancy per 1,000 women between the ages of 15 and 17 (a decrease from the peak of 75 in 1989), and 50 workers per 1,000 women between the ages of 18 and 19 (from the peak of 175 in 1991) and 103 pregnancy cases per 1000 women between the ages of 20-24 (from its peak 202 in 1990). On the other hand, pregnancy rates between old age groups increased mostly since 1973. The 35 to 39 years old reached the highest historical higher in 2019 (in a little more than 73 years per 1000 women), and the rate of forty or older in 2019 (in slightly over 19 years per 1000 women). In 2020, pregnancy rates between women between the ages of 15-19 and 20-24 were generally higher in the south and southwest. Among women between the ages of 30, 34, 35-39, 40 or larger, the rates were generally higher in the northwest and northeast.
Pregnancy desires
Research on pregnancy desires focuses on the positions of the participants that were required for pregnancy before they are pregnant. Based on these positions that were called, the participants are asked if they want to have a child, and if so, if their pregnancy took place almost at the appropriate time, or later what he wanted, or very soon. Data on how women in the United States describe pregnancy cases retroactively (in 2009, 2011, 2013 and 2015) can help provide a crucial context of low pregnancy rates during the same time period (2009-2015).
During this period of time, the report that was reported decreased as a very soon 25 % soon, and the pregnancy rate decreased as a 14 % not required. Throughout all these years, it has been reported that pregnancies have occurred in a timely man As was the case for all pregnancies, it has been reported that the largest percentage of birth cases caused by almost timely (54-58 %). Among the cases of pregnancy that ended with abortion, the largest proportions were reported that they occurred very soon (48-49 %) or as unwanted (42-43 %). State special data is available on pregnancy and pregnancy desires, including trends from 2012 to 2017, in a Guttmacher separate report.
Change patterns by ages from 2009 to 2015
Most of the decrease in the total pregnancy rate between 2009 and 2015 was driven by a decrease in pregnancy between the ages of 15-19 and 20-24.2
In particular, these two age groups have reported significant decreases in the reported pregnancy cases very early, as these rates decreased by 47 % among women between the ages of 15-19 and 23 % among women between the ages of 20 and 24. The rate of unwanted pregnancy decreased significantly for these two age groups, as it decreased by 46 % between 15-19 years and 29 % between 20-24 years. Women between the ages of 35 and 44 have witnessed a significant decrease in the rate of pregnancy that was reported in a very early time, as it decreased by 39 % from 2009 to 2015. Unlike younger women, those between the ages of 35 and 44 have also witnessed 26 % in the rate of pregnancy that was reported in time and an increase of 84 % in the proposal It happened. In addition, the pregnancy product, which later occurred between women between the ages of 35 and 44 years during this time period.
Determine sex categories
The demographic rate is the number of events divided into the number of individuals who can try the event. The accuracy of pregnancy rates depends on the presence of accurate charges of both events (for example, pregnancy, births, miscarriages) and the inhabitants of people who are able to become pregnant. In fact, this population includes some (albeit not all) CISGENDER, sexually transgender men and people whose gender is unusual. To our knowledge, there are no comprehensive estimates of the number or percentage of the United States who are able to become pregnant. As an agent, the population we use to calculate prices is the number of women in a specific age group (Maqam), according to the American Statistical Office. Consequently, throughout the text, we described the rates as among women, although the number of events (rugs: births, miscarriages, fetal losses or all cases of pregnancy) includes the results among all people who are able to get pregnant, regardless of their gender.
Additional resources and cash
The results mentioned in this fact paper are based on data “retroactively”: How individuals remember their desires to become pregnant regarding pregnancy in their past. Another group of research deals with “potential” pregnancy desires for individuals, related to current and future ideas and feelings about pregnancy. Previous efforts to study pregnancy desires that were retroactively in the United States in the first place focused on “unintended” pregnancy and widely criticized by many scientists who provide alternative views on the value of this measurement and the appropriate methods of capturing more accurate – and possibly more accurate – tangible representations of individuals' positions towards pregnancy. For example, see:
Potter je et al. The challenge of unintended pregnancy as an indication of the independence of childbearing. Blessing methods, 2019, 100 (1): 1-4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.005. Kost K and Zolna M, the challenge of unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy: response, contraceptives, 2019, 100 (1): 5-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.010. Gómez am et al. It is not planned, but is it okay? Acceptance of unplanned pregnancy among young people, women's health issues, 2018, 28 (5): 408-414, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.07.001. Aiken Ara et al. Reflection on pregnancy planning model: unintended concepts or non -representative concepts? Perspective on sexual and reproductive health, 2016, 48 (3): 147-151, https://doi.org/10.1363/48E10316. Gómez am et al, poor classification of contradictions in pregnancy intentions: Mixing analysis, views of sexual and reproductive health, 2019, 51 (1): 7-15, https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12088. Maddow-Zimet I and Kost K, the effect of changes in options for responding to the amounts of pregnancy reported: a normal experience in the United States. Public Health Reports, 2020, 135 (3): 354–363, https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920914344.
